Post by account_disabled on Jan 25, 2024 5:40:32 GMT
Which affects our ability to discern. We are unable to recognize virtues in our antagonists. Second, because we lack a legitimate regulatory body. I explain this second reason better. From the point of view of concretizing a general clause or an indeterminate legal concept, such as that of abusive advertising for children, there are two possibilities: either the Judiciary is expected to construct a jurisprudence that allows legal certainty guided by the cases judged, or the regulation of law comes to define the contours of the legal concept.
The first possibility is the one that is in Buy Phone Number List progress via the STJ, and which threatens to be destroyed immediately if the amendment being debated in the Chamber is approved. The second possibility, which would certainly have more immediate effects, is difficult to achieve. The legally legitimized authority to do so would be the National Consumer Secretariat (Senacon). In its role as the central body for formulating the National Consumer Relations Policy, Senacon could lead a broad and open debate that would lead to a regulation with consensual approval. The problem is that Senacon is an organ of the Ministry of Justice, suffering the consequences of the country's political instability. Given this, what to do? I believe that, for now, we can say what not to do: not change the law that is there.
As everyone witnesses every day, advertising has long abandoned direct appeals or propositional formulas, giving way to neutral messages from the point of view of true or false, do this or that. The messages are subtle, influencing the consumer's way of being, the so-called lifestyle. If this advertising is acceptable to adults, the same cannot be said for children. Children cannot be seen as consumers, although it is known that they are also. A child is a developing human being. Your legal protection is not only in the Consumer Protection Code, but also in the Child and Adolescent Statute and the Constitution, which enshrines the principle of absolute priority in your favor.
The first possibility is the one that is in Buy Phone Number List progress via the STJ, and which threatens to be destroyed immediately if the amendment being debated in the Chamber is approved. The second possibility, which would certainly have more immediate effects, is difficult to achieve. The legally legitimized authority to do so would be the National Consumer Secretariat (Senacon). In its role as the central body for formulating the National Consumer Relations Policy, Senacon could lead a broad and open debate that would lead to a regulation with consensual approval. The problem is that Senacon is an organ of the Ministry of Justice, suffering the consequences of the country's political instability. Given this, what to do? I believe that, for now, we can say what not to do: not change the law that is there.
As everyone witnesses every day, advertising has long abandoned direct appeals or propositional formulas, giving way to neutral messages from the point of view of true or false, do this or that. The messages are subtle, influencing the consumer's way of being, the so-called lifestyle. If this advertising is acceptable to adults, the same cannot be said for children. Children cannot be seen as consumers, although it is known that they are also. A child is a developing human being. Your legal protection is not only in the Consumer Protection Code, but also in the Child and Adolescent Statute and the Constitution, which enshrines the principle of absolute priority in your favor.